Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01461
Original file (BC 2013 01461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01461

	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 23 May 2012 and 11 July 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition that precluded him from obtaining an overall satisfactory rating on two contested FAs. 

Had he been diagnosed earlier he would not have failed the contested FAs.

In support of his appeal the applicant provides a medical evaluation letter with a statement from his medical provider indicating he had a medical condition precluding him from achieving a passing score.   

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6).

On 23 May 12 the applicant participated in an FA and obtained an “unsatisfactory” score.  Specifically the applicant failed to meet the minimum component value for Muscle Fitness, completing 39 of the 42 minimum required “Sit-ups” for males under 30. 

On 11 Jul 12 the applicant participated in the second contested FA and obtained an “unsatisfactory” score.  Specifically the applicant failed to meet the minimum component value for Muscle Fitness, completing 38 of the 39 minimum required “Sit-ups” for males 30-39. 

Information extracted from AFFMS shows the applicant has completed and successfully passed 3 more FAs, since his most recent failure on 11 Jul 12.  For each one of these FAs, AFFMS shows that the applicant was “Exempt” for both “Push-Ups” and “Sit-Ups.” 

IAW AFI 36-2905; Atch 1 Para 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” Atch 1, Para 10a, “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results;” Para 2.12.3., “If a member is unable to complete any required portion of the AF Fitness Program (e.g., FA, FIP session, intervention classes), the member must receive written waiver/approval (Table 4.3.) from the Unit CC.” 

On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documents” to support the request.
________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to correct FAs dated 23 May 12 and 11 Jul 12.  

DPSIM references, AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program (dated 1 July 2010) AFGM 4 (dated 3 Jan 2012) Paragraph 10: "If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander." In accordance with the AFI, the applicant did not provide an invalidation memorandum from the Commander stating that the FAs from 23 May 2012 and 11 July 2012 should be deleted from AFFMS. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________

ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to correct FAs dated 23 May 12 and 11 Jul 12, as AFI 36-2905 provides no authority for removal of fitness assessments due to pre-existing medical conditions. The applicant has four failed FAs within a 24-month period in which there are inconsistencies in component outcomes. The medical review requested by the commander was for administrative separation purposes only to determine whether the applicant should be retained or discharged based on his four failed FAs within a 24-month period. Moreover, there are inconsistencies in his component scores of different FAs during the period in which he contends his medical condition prevented successful completion. For example during the 2 Mar 11, 23 May 12, and 11 Jul 12, FA, he appears to have struggled with the sit-up component, but scored higher in this component during the 30 Jan 12 FA.
_______________________________________________________________  

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2. The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that he has met his burden of proving the contested FAs should be removed from the AFFMS. In this respect, we note that based the applicant’s four failed FAs within a 24-month period, his commanderrequested a medical review to determine if any medical condition was responsible for his inability to achieve a passing score in order to decide whether the applicant should be retained or administrative discharge action should be initiated. While the applicant has provided the results of this medical review, indicating that he had a medical condition precluding him from achieving a passing score, this in and of itself, does not convince us the contested FAs should be invalidated. We note the results of the medical review; however, it does not indicate what the condition was or how it prevented him from successfully completing the FAs. Moreover, we find no letter of support from the commander requesting the FA be invalidated nor evidence of the action taken by the applicant prior to the contested FAs to ensure he was on the appropriate profile. Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider this request. However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________

Due to the unavailability of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx has signed as Acting Panel Chair. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01461 in Executive Session on 21 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

 	XXXXXXX, Chair
 	XXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01461:

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 27 Nov 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 14.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Mar 12.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Apr 14.



	XXXXXXX 
      Acting Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802

    Original file (BC 2013 01802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01174

    Original file (BC 2013 01174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01174 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 14 July 2011, 02 Feb 2012, and 31 Mar 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02521

    Original file (BC 2013 02521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Along with his personal statement, the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider that validates he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. On that same memorandum, the applicant’s medical provider indicated he had a “documented medical condition that precluded him/her from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” IAW AFI 36-2905; Atch 1, Para 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235

    Original file (BC 2013 03235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220

    Original file (BC 2013 03220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822

    Original file (BC 2013 00822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02001

    Original file (BC 2013 02001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02001 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In the letter he expresses his opinion, explaining how his medical condition and pride of admitting his physical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02839

    Original file (BC 2013 02839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submits; a letter from his medical provider, dated 17 May 13 indicating that he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from a passing score; and VA Form 10-5345, Request for and Authorization to Release Medical Records or Health Information, reflecting that he requested a copy of his medical documents from the Department of Veterans Affairs. A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 19...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03849

    Original file (BC 2013 03849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 Aug 13, the applicant provided a response to the Letter of Counseling (LOC) he was issued as a result of not passing the contested FA. The applicant presents documentation of difficulty with the contested FA due an illness/injury but did not obtain an invalidation letter from his commander. We note the comments of AFPC/DPSIM indicating the applicant should have made the fitness assessment cell (FAC) staff aware that he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the FA on...